|
|
Master SOA Design Pattern Catalog
|
|
|
|

Composition Autonomy (Erl)

|

Home > Composition Implementation Patterns > Composition Autonomy
|
|
How can compositions be implemented to minimize loss of
autonomy?
|
|
|
|
|

Problem

Composition controller services naturally lose autonomy when
delegating processing tasks to composed services, some of which
may be shared across multiple compositions.
|
|

Solution

All composition participants can be isolated to maximize the
autonomy of the composition as a whole.
|
|

Application

The agnostic member services of a composition are redundantly
implemented in an isolated environment together with the task
service.
|
 |
 |
 |

Impacts

Increasing autonomy on a composition level results in increased
infrastructure costs and government responsibilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|


|
By grouping the services of a composition into a separate deployment environment, the collective autonomy is
maximized because the implementation is dedicated to the composition, and none of the services are otherwise
shared. Services C and D in particular benefit from this new implementation as they are no longer subject to
shared access.

|
|
|
This page contains excerpts from:

SOA Design Patterns by Thomas Erl

Foreword by Grady Booch

With contributions from David Chappell, Jason Hogg, Anish Karmarkar, Mark Little, David Orchard, Satadru Roy, Thomas Rischbeck, Arnaud Simon, Clemens Utschig, Dennis Wisnosky, and others.

(ISBN: 0136135161, Hardcover, Full-Color, 400+ Illustrations, 865 pages)

For more information about this book, visit www.soabooks.com.
|
|